Saturday, November 17, 2007

Apparently it was a Speech Not an Essay

But either way I found it! It's a tad unpolished, I'm not above admitting that I'm the 'do it the night before and wing it if anything goes wrong' style of student, and some of my ideas were left out or changed a bit. This would be because I was presenting it in school for grading and there was a lovely plethora of rules it had to follow. I'll highlight the key areas as I do in my articles.

Enjoy:

"The war on drugs, seemingly a noble battle, but is it worth the cost? Is it even noble? At first glance it, much like communism, seems ideal; both systems work perfectly on paper. Unfortunately paper can’t account for all the variables. Ideally heavy sentencing and good police work would act as deterrence to most would be offenders, and then the few remaining nefarious drug abusers would easily be apprehended. So what’s the major hitch in the plan? It simply does. Not. Work. People continue to abuse illegal substances despite the heavy punishments; fines, imprisonment, and a permanent blemish on their legal record. Millions, if not billions, of Canadian tax dollars are being thrown away on a ‘war’ that simply generates a need to throw away more tax dollars (in 1997 the average cost per federal inmate per year was $48,468) I am here to suggest another method, I am here to suggest a more efficient way of keeping illegal substances in check… and what better way to do that, than to legalize them?

Sounds outrageous right? But think about it, those who truly want to consume these drugs often do regardless, and often, due to legality, take great risks to feed their desire, and their urge to experiment with the drug. I propose that in stead of throwing away tax dollars on a losing battle the government takes steps towards the regulation and sale of formerly illegal drugs. It is my belief that this could solve a number of drug related problems within society, such as; overdoses, theft, and the swelling Canadian prisons. By selling various ‘illicit’ drugs itself, similar to cigarettes only entirely controlled by the government, the government would be able to sell product cheaper than most drug dealers and, in turn, regulate that drug and control its purity. This would ensure that fewer people would start on one drug, and find themselves addicted to something else due to lacing, and, assuming somebody accidentally overdosed, there would be less concern about calling the paramedics, as the users would no longer be criminal offenders.

With the government creating and selling it’s own ‘product’ in stead of spending tax dollars, in a seemingly failed attempt to stop drug circulation, the government would have a new means of supplementing its income. Without a middle man, such as in cigarette companies, the government would receive 100% income on their product, which would be able to greatly benefit society, this money could go toward; a better equipped police force, education, general tax relief for society, the list goes on. Gang violence would likely be cut in half, as gangs would no longer fight over drugs, and, using the money from drug sales, the government would be able to better train and equip the various police forces.

Much like any change, my idea has some massive holes in it. Surely we don’t want to make all drugs legal; there are many that pose a great risk to the user and society. Drugs like methamphetamines, for example, pose a threat to both the user, and those around the drug in general (as methamphetamines tend to be highly toxic). There would have to be some restrictions for on the job as well, much like a politician, police officer, teacher, businessman –even a manager at McDonalds- can’t come to work drunk, neither should they be allowed to whilst ‘tripping’ or ‘stoned’; they should suffer a harsher penalty than had they been drinking.

In conclusion, my idea would help to; supplement tax dollars, remove two sources of heavy tax burden, help to end gang violence (and potentially general petty theft), help to minimize the number of ‘OD’ victims, and help to make the users of such drugs, and people in general, feel like they have a bit more of their promised freedom. Of course my idea isn’t perfect, but the system we have now doesn’t seem to be perfect either, and in many ways the system we have now doesn’t seem to work at all. Perhaps the legalization and regulation of what are, currently, illegal drugs, is a step in the right direction. I leave it to you, to decide for yourself."

Oh, and for anybody that's wondering, still no dice on the headaches... I'm not overly worried though, I've put up with the random headaches for a few years this is just the worst they've hit me.

Take it easy all,
-Wraith

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

It is an interesting argument, that has been going on for quite some time. I do beleve that pot, hash and possibly Shrooms(sillysimon) should be legal and regulated. I think this argument also raises another question, Why is the government allowed to tell me what i can and cannot do to my own body? If i am not hurting anyone else then why is it their concern if i smoke a joint. Now highly addictive druggs usually end up becomming the governments problem when they have a crackaddic who cannot even care for themselves anymore, but i think think we need a better form of education surrounding harmfull drugs. Now Pot If used all of the time has simmilar potential problems as tobacco, but there are soo many 'legal' things that i see as being just as harmeful. I think that the whole government cracking down on tobacco(but not really) Is just a fancy show. There are so many harmful things in the products we use and the food that we eat, that if the government was really looking out for our health, they would never have been allowed on the market in the first place. The above argument could also be refered to the whole Global Warming issue as well. Sorry for the rant.

Britt

Wraith said...

I invite rants here Britt ^^... I love reading other people's thoughts and ideas and maybe incorporating them into my scheme to solve all the world's problems (that sadly requires a massive social change by the people)

As it stands I'm actually working on trying to perfect a version of Communism that would actually work *without* being the scary 'secret police' type communism.

Anywho, for an interesting high (uh, not that I would know <.<) Salvia is entirely 100% legal. It's a 15 minute trip of some of the craziest hallucinations possible. (My one friend, for example, thought he spent one hundred years as his couch) but then it acts as an upper for the next two weeks. So far they haven't found any debilitating effects.

I don't promote drug use, I promote knowledge to make informed decisions by :D.

-Wraith

Anonymous said...

Yes...I have tried Salvia, ands i also know (well acording to CBC Radio) That the only reason that salvia is legal is because of the lack of reserch done into it. I would also not like to sound stupid but what the government tells you about pot and what really happens are two completly different things. There are many dissagrements in the health world as to what the harmfull effects of pot are. Governments pick the facts that they tell you and omit the others. They also attempt to discredit anyone who says different.

Britt

Wraith said...

Pot has some good benefits... I don't touch it though, I watched it destroy a friend of mine. Pot is great in moderation, it's when people get carried away that it becomes damaging... and though I doubt everybody goes his route I all but lost my best friend to pot... he hasn't even tried to speak to me in months.

-Wraith

Wraith said...

Oh, and also, about Salvia, there's an Indian tribe that has been using Salvia as part of their spiritual awakenings for hundreds of years... so I imagine it can't be *too* bad for your system.

-Wraith

Anonymous said...

There have been variaties of many drugs around for thousands of years. Salvia, pot, and shrooms have been used for religious experences, while primitive forms of acid have also been used. I beleve it was in south america where they would pourposly let some of theie wheat go mouldy, and an unrefined chemical would form which people boil down today and make acid from.

And im sorry for your friend. i agree that pot if used properly is great. I am a part time user, but i use it more for a spiritual/mystical experence rather than to get high(sounds kind of strange concidering im an athiest). I have also seen pot take people down a rough road. Usually in my friends cases(and they are multiple) they simply use pot as the gateway drug to harder drugs, and that is where you loose them. I do understand how it feels.

Britt

Fabian said...

Great essay, Wraith. It's really a pleasure to see someone who shares my thoughts stating it so much more eloquently than I can. Oh and Britt, there's nothing strange with an Atheist having spiritual experiences. Atheism just means you don't believe in an intelligent Creator (or something along those lines), not the divine.

Anonymous said...

Good for people to know.